Execution Modes
How Architectures Are Evaluated
The Studio evaluates filed system architectures through a defined set of execution modes that govern how work is structured, exercised, reviewed, and assessed. These execution modes describe internal evaluation mechanisms only and do not represent development stages, collaboration pathways, or commercialization activity.
Architectural System Design
Designing Coherent Intelligence Architectures
The Studio serves as an environment for formal system architecture design across computational, communicative, and human–machine domains. Work in this focus area emphasizes explicit system boundaries, interface definitions, state transitions, and interaction logic.
Rather than producing isolated components, it evaluates architectures as integrated systems, ensuring that complexity is resolved through structure and governance rather than deferred to downstream implementation or external interpretation.
Simulation & Controlled Evaluation
Testing Systems Before They Are Real
The Studio prioritizes simulation, modeling, and controlled evaluation as primary execution tools. System architectures are exercised in constrained environments to observe behavior, identify failure modes, and validate assumptions without exposing systems to real-world, institutional, or market consequences.
This focus area allows systems to fail safely, early, and informatively, preserving rigor while avoiding premature commitment or external dependency.
Governance & Execution Discipline
Imposing Structure on Complex Work
The Studio enforces governance mechanisms that shape how work is conducted, reviewed, and evaluated. These mechanisms include execution gates, role definition, collaboration constraints, and evaluation criteria that prevent architectural drift, scope creep, and incentive misalignment.
Governance within the Studio is not administrative overhead; it functions as a design constraint that directly influences system coherence, evaluability, and long-term viability.
Translational Readiness Assessment
Studio Departure Criteria
Before any architecture informs a publication, grant application, or commercialization effort, it undergoes translational readiness assessment within the Studio. This assessment evaluates whether an architecture is sufficiently coherent, documented, and bounded to withstand exposure to external incentives and institutional forces.
Architectures that do not meet these criteria are refined or discontinued within the Studio rather than being prematurely disclosed or externally relied upon.
Structured Collaboration Interfaces
Engaging Without Contaminating the Core
The Studio defines explicit collaboration interfaces for academic, clinical, and institutional participants. Participation is scoped to defined project units, simulation environments, or evaluation tasks, ensuring that collaboration contributes to system validation without eroding architectural intent or intellectual property integrity.
This execution mode enables limited, governed external participation while preserving the Studio's role as a protected execution environment.
Knowledge Integration & System Continuity
Coherence Across Ideas, Artifacts, and Time
The Studio maintains continuity across complex bodies of work that evolve over extended periods and span multiple domains, contributors, and output forms. This execution mode ensures that architectural intent, definitions, assumptions, and decisions remain consistent as systems undergo design, evaluation, documentation, and controlled disclosure.
Rather than treating research outputs, creative artifacts, management efforts, and technical developments as separate streams, the Studio integrates them into a coherent system lineage. This preserves conceptual coherence, prevents fragmentation, and maintains institutional memory even as participants, funding mechanisms, or external contexts change.
© 2026 Grasso & Co., LLC. All rights reserved.
DLEV Studio is an internal, non-commercial execution and evaluation initiative of Grasso & Co., LLC.
This site is informational only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or agreement.